Category
AI Strategy & Leadership
How to lead in the agentic era: AI strategy, org design, governance, the PM-to-builder shift, and what executive adoption actually looks like in practice.
Category
How to lead in the agentic era: AI strategy, org design, governance, the PM-to-builder shift, and what executive adoption actually looks like in practice.
Showing 1–12 of 28 articles in AI Strategy & Leadership

Most enterprise AI teams centralise first, then decentralise. Both fail. Here's the hub-and-spoke structure that actually works.
Keith Rabois' barrels vs. ammunition framework reframes what AI changes about teams. More ammunition without more barrels solves the wrong problem.

90%+ enterprise AI tool access, most people stuck in chat. The rollout bottleneck isn't the model. It's the harness. Here's the product fix.
The top AI user in high-performing companies isn't engineering — it's the CMO. Here's why that's the real signal for whether AI adoption has reached the decision layer.

The best AI growth teams deliberately sacrifice short-term metrics. Restraint on pricing, error handling, and safety compounds into retention and trust.

Growth teams trained in linear markets spend 70% on small experiments. In exponential markets, that allocation captures a rounding error.

AI coding tools tripled engineering output overnight. PM and design headcount stayed flat. The ratio broke, and most orgs haven't noticed yet.

A 97% attack detection rate sounds fine until an agentic system has tool access, private data, and a path to action. Then it is a breach rate.

When prototypes take hours not weeks, the bottleneck is not engineering any more. It is judgment: which option deserves trust, testing, and investment.

AI productivity does not hand ambitious builders spare time. It increases the number of bets, side projects, and decisions they can pursue each week.

Zapier's V2 AI Fluency Rubric reveals a calibration problem. Most companies' target for AI adoption maps to Zapier's baseline, one step above their minimum.

Anthropic research reveals a 61-point gap between AI capability and actual deployment. That gap explains why the workforce apocalypse has not arrived yet.